Clinton and Bush's Report Cards on Crime Reduction: The Data Show Bush Policies Are Undermining Clinton Gains

John Donohue

The Economists' Voice, 2004, vol. 1, issue 1, 10

Abstract: At the Democratic Convention Clinton argued that he had put police on the street and took guns off, but that Bush has done the opposite. Was Clinton truly more anti-crime? I estimate that Clinton-era federal programs were responsible for a six to eight percent reduction in crime seen in the last decade. The Bush administration has failed to build on the Clinton administration's success in funding more police. For no good reason, a crime-control program that has a very favorable benefit/cost ratio is being cut back.

Keywords: crime; Clinton; Bush; assault weapons (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1002 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:evoice:v:1:y:2004:i:1:n:4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ev/html

DOI: 10.2202/1553-3832.1002

Access Statistics for this article

The Economists' Voice is currently edited by Michael Cragg, Dwight Jaffee and Joseph Stiglitz

More articles in The Economists' Voice from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().