Posner responds to "Why Mickey Mouse is Not Subject to Congestion," by Michele Boldrin and David Levine

Richard Posner

The Economists' Voice, 2004, vol. 1, issue 2, 2

Abstract: The question is whether it is possible to have a congestion externality in intellectual property, such as the Mickey Mouse character. Literally, the answer is no. Figuratively, it is yes.

Keywords: Copyright; congestion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1023 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:evoice:v:1:y:2004:i:2:n:5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ev/html

DOI: 10.2202/1553-3832.1023

Access Statistics for this article

The Economists' Voice is currently edited by Michael Cragg, Dwight Jaffee and Joseph Stiglitz

More articles in The Economists' Voice from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().