The Accuracy of Economic Measurement in the Health and Retirement Study
Eric French (),
John Jones () and
Jeremy McCauley ()
Forum for Health Economics & Policy, 2017, vol. 20, issue 2, 16
We assess the quality of the HRS’s measures of out-of-pocket medical spending and health insurance premia, both in the “core interviews” and in the “exit interview” data. We provide detailed evidence on the quality of the HRS insurance premia data, and we compare the HRS exit data to exit data in the MCBS. We document how changes in survey questions, including the introduction of “unfolding brackets,” affect the HRS measures. We document what we believe are errors in the HRS imputations and provide some suggestions for improving the accuracy of some imputed variables. Overall, we find the HRS data to be of high quality. However, we believe that many interesting variables in the HRS are under-utilized because users must perform imputations themselves.
Keywords: accuracy of data; health insurance; HRS; medical spending (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/fhep.2017.20.issu ... -0001.xml?format=INT (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:fhecpo:v:20:y:2017:i:2:p:16:n:3
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Forum for Health Economics & Policy is currently edited by Dana Goldman
More articles in Forum for Health Economics & Policy from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().