COVID-19 Biopharmaceutical Innovation and Industry Appropriation

Philipson Tomas J. (), Fendrick A. Mark, Kataria Aarushi, Di Cera Giuseppe, Zhao Qi, Guo Susu and Abbasi Attaullah
Additional contact information
Philipson Tomas J.: The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Fendrick A. Mark: The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Kataria Aarushi: The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Di Cera Giuseppe: The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Zhao Qi: The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Guo Susu: The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Abbasi Attaullah: The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

Forum for Health Economics & Policy, 2024, vol. 27, issue 2, 117-146

Abstract: The rapid emergence of vaccines and therapeutics in response to the onset of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic demonstrated the value of medical innovation. These advances not only led to enhanced patient welfare by reducing the disease’s mortality and morbidity but also reduced the need for costly prevention measures, such as cuts in economic activity. This paper offers the first estimate of the portion of economic value generated by these medical innovations that was appropriated as earnings by the innovating companies, measured by the ratio of company earnings to the overall societal value generated by the innovations. To estimate the value and appropriation of COVID-19 innovations, one must necessarily make assumptions about what disease-specific and preventive activity would have been in the absence of these new innovations. To obtain robustness in our findings across such scenarios, we estimate industry appropriation across a wide range of counterfactual scenarios that would occur under no innovation. These scenarios include previous assessments of the contributing subparts of the value generated by the innovations. Our primary finding is that, within the large range of these counterfactual scenarios, upper-bound measures of the proportion of value appropriated by the industry ranged from 0.2 % to 4.6 % of the value generated by the vaccine and treatment innovations. Even though these are upper bound appropriation rates, they are significantly lower than those documented for other significant health sciences innovations. This suggests that COVID-19 vaccines and treatments were remarkable, not only in their swift development but also in the considerable societal value they provided, which extended far beyond the rewards to the innovating companies.

Keywords: pharmaceutical innovation; COVID-19; industry appropriation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2024-0049 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:fhecpo:v:27:y:2024:i:2:p:117-146:n:1001

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyte ... ournal/key/fhep/html

DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2024-0049

Access Statistics for this article

Forum for Health Economics & Policy is currently edited by Dana Goldman

More articles in Forum for Health Economics & Policy from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().