WACC or APV?

Sabal Jaime
Additional contact information
Sabal Jaime: ESADE (Spain)

Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, 2008, vol. 2, issue 2, 17

Abstract: Miller and Modigliani's seminal papers (1958, 1963) gave rise to two alternative methodologies for project and firm valuations: the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) and Adjusted Present Value (APV). As is often the case of many larger firms in industrialized economies, whenever a target debt ratio is set up for the long term, WACC might be a good approximation. However, APV has certain advantages making it more convenient for smaller companies with unstable debt ratios, in countries with complex tax legislation and in emerging markets where high economic uncertainty makes the leveraging decision much more opportunistic.

Keywords: WACC; APV; valuation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-9156.1016 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:jbvela:v:2:y:2008:i:2:n:1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jbvela/html

DOI: 10.2202/1932-9156.1016

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis is currently edited by Bradley T. Ewing and James J. Hoffman

More articles in Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().