Relationships between rugby sevens performance indicators and international tournament outcomes

Higham Dean G. (), Hopkins Will G., Pyne David B. and Anson Judith M.
Additional contact information
Higham Dean G.: Australian Institute of Sport – Physiology, Canberra, ACT, Australia University of Canberra – National Institute of Sport Studies, Canberra, ACT, Australia Australian Rugby Union, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Hopkins Will G.: Auckland University of Technology – Sport and Recreation, Auckland, New Zealand
Pyne David B.: Australian Institute of Sport – Physiology, Canberra, ACT, Australia University of Canberra – National Institute of Sport Studies, Canberra, ACT, Australia
Anson Judith M.: University of Canberra – National Institute of Sport Studies, Canberra, ACT, Australia

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 2014, vol. 10, issue 1, 81-87

Abstract: Objectives: Identifying performance indicators related to rugby sevens competition outcomes will inform development of team tactics that increase the likelihood of success. This study characterized 16 team performance indicators and quantified the effect of changes and differences in performance indicators within and between teams on team ranking in international tournaments.Design: Official tournament statistics and final ranking of each team in each of nine men’s tournaments of the 2011/2012 International Rugby Board Sevens World Series were analyzed in a retrospective longitudinal design.Methods: Novel analyses involving linear mixed modeling quantified the effects within and between teams of an increase in performance indicators from a typically low to typically high value on the logarithm of the tournament ranking. Magnitudes of effects were assessed using a smallest meaningful difference in ranking.Results: Three performance indicators had substantial within-team effects and 12 had substantial between-team effects on tournament ranking. More entries into the opposition’s 22-m zone per match, tries per entry into the opposition’s 22-m zone, tackles per match, passes per match, rucks per match and a higher percentage of tackle completion were associated with a better mean ranking. Conversely, more passes per try, rucks per try, kicks per try, errors per match, surrendered possessions per match, and missed tackles per match were related to a worse ranking.Conclusions: The most successful teams maintain ball possession by reducing errors and turnovers, are efficient in converting possession into tries, and have effective defensive structures resulting in a high rate of tackle completion.

Keywords: match analysis; modeling; notational analysis; performance analysis; rugby union; statistics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2013-0095 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:10:y:2014:i:1:p:81-87:n:5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jqas/html

DOI: 10.1515/jqas-2013-0095

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports is currently edited by Mark Glickman

More articles in Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().