Scoring Variables and Judge Bias in United States Dressage Competitions

Diaz Ana E., Johnston Mary S., Lucitti Jennifer, Neckameyer Wendi S. and Moran Katy M.
Additional contact information
Diaz Ana E.: Dupont
Johnston Mary S.: @@@@
Lucitti Jennifer: University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
Neckameyer Wendi S.: Saint Louis University School of Medicine
Moran Katy M.: @@@@

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 2010, vol. 6, issue 3, 21

Abstract: Dressage is an Olympic equestrian discipline with rules governed by The Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI). After questions arose regarding dressage scoring during the 2008 Olympics, the FEI undertook studies of dressage scoring at international equestrian competitions in Europe. These studies included investigations of scoring scales and judging bias. Based on those results, the FEI recommended the use of statistics to improve the consistency of judge training in dressage competition. The authors performed a statistical analysis of dressage scores earned by riders in the United States. This work demonstrates the lack of consistency in judging in the United States. This is the first published study that looks at U.S. dressage results. It includes a very large data set considered representative of the population of riders in the U.S. Dressage is a subjectively judged sport. The final score, not the class placing, is of greatest importance when assessing rider results. The authors show how mainstream statistical tools can identify factors impacting the final dressage score. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to demonstrate the existence of key variables which impact scores. The analysis shows there are variations in scoring patterns by horse breed, as well as the existence of high-scoring and low-scoring judges. Finally, the analysis shows that there are increased standard deviations at the "extremes" of the judging scale. This would indicate there is variability in interpretation of scoring at the upper and lower ends of the scoring scale. Analysis of Means (ANOM) identified five judges whose scores were statistically different than the grand average scores.

Keywords: equestrian; ANOVA; ANOM; dressage; Fédération Equestre Internationale (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1559-0410.1251 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:6:y:2010:i:3:n:13

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jqas/html

DOI: 10.2202/1559-0410.1251

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports is currently edited by Mark Glickman

More articles in Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().