When the Weak Roar: Understanding Protracted Intrastate Conflict
Midlarsky Manus I. () and
Midlarsky Elizabeth R.
Additional contact information
Midlarsky Manus I.: Department of Political Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
Midlarsky Elizabeth R.: Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, 2013, vol. 19, issue 3, 321-331
Abstract:
Much research on protracted intrastate conflict has either centered on internal conditions characterizing an important protagonist (e.g., motivated by grievance and/or greed), or on dyadic interactions between them that frequently employ game theory. Cross-sectional methodologies often are used in empirical testing. Here, we propose to use the dyad as the principal unit of analysis, but examine each of the actor’s diachronically as they interact with each other. Specifically, the ephemeral gain, a theory integral to Origins of Political Extremism (Cambridge 2011), has been employed in this analysis. We hypothesize that whether as rebel or government, when an actor engaged in intrastate conflict experiences an ephemeral gain, it is more likely to prolong the conflict. If both actors have experienced this phenomenon, then the conflict is even more likely to continue. Important here is the risk acceptance by rebels resulting from the anger attendant upon an ephemeral gain. Research in social psychology strongly supports this variable sequence. The case of the Kurds in the Ottoman Empire, the Republic of Turkey, Iraq, and Iran is offered as an illustration. Ephemeral gains experienced both by the Kurds and by the Republic of Turkey acted to prolong this conflict to the present day.
Keywords: civil war; protracted conflict; ephemeral gain; Kurds; Turkey (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2013-0041 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:19:y:2013:i:3:p:321-331:n:9
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/peps/html
DOI: 10.1515/peps-2013-0041
Access Statistics for this article
Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy is currently edited by Raul Caruso
More articles in Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().