Does Fiscal Decentralization Mitigate Domestic Terrorism?
Arzaghi Mohammad () and
Khusrav Gaibulloev
Additional contact information
Arzaghi Mohammad: Department of Economics, 47767 American University of Sharjah , Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, 2024, vol. 30, issue 3, 273-291
Abstract:
Many countries have embarked on decentralization as a way to mitigate separation tendencies. Even though decentralization could satisfy some separation tendencies, the central government might be unable or unwilling to award the localities the level of decentralization they require to stay in the union. This mismatch may give rise to domestic violence and internal conflict. We propose a simple two-stage model that combines the decentralization and domestic terrorism literature in a single structural model, which can be readily tested using existing data in the disciplines. As long as the actual decentralization level meets the unobserved desired value by the localities, there will be a high likelihood of observing a zero incidence of domestic terrorism. Otherwise, the incidents happen regularly with mitigating effects from decentralization. Our model also accounts for the left-censoring of the terrorism data at zero. We examine our model using 5-year interval panel data of more than 60 countries based on the information for 1970–2019. Our results indicate a strong negative and statistically significant relationship between fiscal decentralization and domestic terrorism events. One percent increase in fiscal decentralization is associated with a two to three percent decline in domestic terrorism incidents. The coefficients of the selection model and domestic terrorism model generally conform to the literature.
Keywords: domestic terrorism; fiscal decentralization; sample selection; Heckman selection model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D74 H70 H77 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2024-0018 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:30:y:2024:i:3:p:273-291:n:1003
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/peps/html
DOI: 10.1515/peps-2024-0018
Access Statistics for this article
Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy is currently edited by Raul Caruso
More articles in Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().