Potential Savings from Reform of DOE Nuclear Weapons Stewardship and from Nuclear Stockpile Reductions

Mello Greg, Lichterman Andrew and Weida William
Additional contact information
Mello Greg: Los Alamos Study Group
Lichterman Andrew: Los Alamos Study Group
Weida William: Global Resource Action Center for the Environment

Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, 1999, vol. 5, issue 2, 38

Abstract: The first section of this paper presents our general conclusions and recommendations. These conclusions are supported in Appendix I by a detailed, line-by-line analysis of the Stockpile Stewardship and Management budget. This appendix also includes our rationale for each of the suggested cuts. Appendix II calculates cuts to the DOD budget that would accompany the Stockpile Stewardship cuts we propose. Appendix III shows specific differences in the assumptions about Stockpile Stewardship made by the authors and by the DOE Laboratories.The views presented in this paper represent those of the authors and not those of any other organization, publication, or entity.

Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-8597.1021 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:5:y:1999:i:2:n:2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/peps/html

DOI: 10.2202/1554-8597.1021

Access Statistics for this article

Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy is currently edited by Raul Caruso

More articles in Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().