Multiple Testing Issues in Discriminating Compound-Related Peaks and Chromatograms from High Frequency Noise, Spikes and Solvent-Based Noise in LC - MS Data Sets
Nyangoma Stephen O,
C. van Kampen Antoine A. H.,
Reijmers Theo H,
Govorukhina Natalia I,
J. van der Zee Ate G.,
Billingham Lucinda J,
Bischoff Rainer and
Jansen Ritsert C.
Additional contact information
Nyangoma Stephen O: University of Birmingham
C. van Kampen Antoine A. H.: Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam
Reijmers Theo H: University of Leiden
Govorukhina Natalia I: University of Groningen
J. van der Zee Ate G.: University Medical Centre Groningen
Billingham Lucinda J: University of Birmingham
Bischoff Rainer: University of Groningen
Jansen Ritsert C.: University of Groningen
Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2007, vol. 6, issue 1, 1-49
Liquid Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) is a powerful method for sensitive detection and quantification of proteins and peptides in complex biological fluids like serum. LC-MS produces complex data sets, consisting of some hundreds of millions of data points per sample at a resolution of 0.1 amu in the m/z domain and 7000 data points in the time domain. However, the detection of the lower abundance proteins from this data is hampered by the presence of artefacts, such as high frequency noise and spikes. Moreover, not all of the tens of thousands of the chromatograms produced per sample are relevant for the pursuit of the biomarkers. Thus in analysing the LC-MS data, two critical pre-processing issues arise. Which of the thousands of the: 1. chromatograms per sample are relevant for the detection of the biomarkers?, and 2. signals per chromatogram are truly compound-related? Each of these issues involves assessing the significance (deviation from noise) of multiple observations and the issue of multiple comparisons arises. Current methods disregard the multiplicity and provide no concrete threshold for significance. However, with such procedures, the probability of one or more false-positives is high as the number of tests to be performed is large, and must be controlled. Realizing that the cut-offs for declaring a chromatogram (or a signal) to be compound-related can hugely influence which proteins are detected, it seems natural to define thresholds that are neither arbitrary nor subjective. We suggest the choice of thresholds guided by the critical aim of controlling the False Discovery Rate (FDR) in multiple hypotheses testing for significance over a large set of features produced per sample. This involves the use of the regression diagnostics to characterize the signals of a chromatogram (e.g. as outliers or influential) and to suggest suitable tests statistics for the multiple testing procedures (MTP) for discriminating noise and spikes from true signals. The role of the Generalized Linear Models (GLM) in this MTP is investigated. The method is applied to LC-MS datasets from trypsin-digested serum spiked with varying levels of horse heart cytochrome C (cytoc).
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:6:y:2007:i:1:n:23
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology is currently edited by Michael P. H. Stumpf
More articles in Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().