A Regularized Regression Approach for Dissecting Genetic Conflicts that Increase Disease Risk in Pregnancy

Li Shaoyu, Lu Qing, Fu Wenjiang, Romero Roberto and Cui Yuehua
Additional contact information
Li Shaoyu: Michigan State University
Lu Qing: Michigan State University
Fu Wenjiang: Michigan State University
Romero Roberto: NICHD/NIH
Cui Yuehua: Michigan State University

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2009, vol. 8, issue 1, 30

Abstract: Human diseases developed during pregnancy could be caused by the direct effects of both maternal and fetal genes, and/or by the indirect effects caused by genetic conflicts. Genetic conflicts exist when the effects of fetal genes are opposed by the effects of maternal genes, or when there is a conflict between the maternal and paternal genes within the fetal genome. The two types of genetic conflicts involve the functions of different genes in different genomes and are genetically distinct. Differentiating and further dissecting the two sets of genetic conflict effects that increase disease risk during pregnancy present statistical challenges, and have been traditionally pursued as two separate endeavors. In this article, we develop a unified framework to model and test the two sets of genetic conflicts via a regularized regression approach. Our model is developed considering real situations in which the paternal information is often completely missing; an assumption that fails most of the current family-based studies. A mixture model-based penalized logistic regression is proposed for data sampled from a natural population. We develop a variable selection procedure to select significant genetic features. Simulation studies show that the model has high power and good false positive control under reasonable sample sizes and disease allele frequency. A case study of small for gestational age (SGA) is provided to show the utility of the proposed approach. Our model provides a powerful tool for dissecting genetic conflicts that increase disease risk during pregnancy, and offers a testable framework for the genetic conflict hypothesis previously proposed.

Keywords: complex disease; genetic conflicts; genomic imprinting; maternal-fetal genotype incompatibility; penalized mixture logistic regression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1474 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:8:y:2009:i:1:n:45

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/sagmb/html

DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1474

Access Statistics for this article

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology is currently edited by Michael P. H. Stumpf

More articles in Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().