Securitization reversed. Does Europeanization improve minority/majority relations?
Nancheva Nevena ()
Additional contact information
Nancheva Nevena: Centre for Research in Communities, Identities and Difference, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston-upon-Thames, KT1 2EE, London, UK
Comparative Southeast European Studies, 2017, vol. 65, issue 1, 10-34
Abstract:
Through a conceptual framework that combines the English School’s focus on primary institutions in international society with the Copenhagen School’s theory of securitization and desecuritization, this article studies the Europeanization of national minorities. It thus signals a categorical departure from the dominant norms transfer approach to problems of national minorities in the European Union (EU), an approach that has failed to convincingly account for many minority outcomes of European integration. This is particularly true of the continual attachment of national minorities to the state’s security agenda. The article takes Galbreath and McEvoy’s (2012) hypothesis that the EU has a unique potential to desecuritize national minorities, and applies it to one candidate (Macedonia) and one new member state (Bulgaria). It assesses flashpoints of minority/majority tensions across several sectors (the judiciary, the police, public administration, political representation, education, and health care). The investigation ascertains negative outcomes—desecuritization—but points to the crisis of confidence in the primary institution of European integration (supranationality) and the ensuing consolidation of nationalism as the dominant institution of pre-EU European society. The article concludes that improved minority/majority relations are a possible consequence of Europeanization rather than a precondition for it.
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2017-0002 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:soeuro:v:65:y:2017:i:1:p:10-34:n:2
DOI: 10.1515/soeu-2017-0002
Access Statistics for this article
Comparative Southeast European Studies is currently edited by Sabine Rutar
More articles in Comparative Southeast European Studies from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().