Péage urbain et (in)justice perçue: un obstacle à l'expérimentation en France ?

Stéphanie Souche-Le Corvec, Charles Raux and Yves Croissant

Revue française d'économie, 2011, vol. Volume XXVI, issue 2, 149-176

Abstract: With an attitude survey in Lyon, we test different principles of rationing car traffic by prices (road toll) or by quantities (odd numbers or reduced day of travelling). Rationing by price or by quantity is strongly perceived as unfair by responders. Attitudes towards tolls justified by the pollution caused by automobile traffic are less negative. On the compensation side, car-pooling should have free toll. Support for a reduced rate for low-income users means an equity position we have to answer.

Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=RFE_112_0149 (application/pdf)
http://www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-economie-2011-2-page-149.htm (text/html)
free

Related works:
Working Paper: Péage urbain et (in)justice perçue: un obstacle à l'expérimentation en France ? (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cai:rferfe:rfe_112_0149

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Revue française d'économie from Presses de Sciences-Po
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire ().