Péage urbain et (in)justice perçue: un obstacle à l'expérimentation en France ?

Stéphanie Souche-Le Corvec, Charles Raux () and Yves Croissant
Additional contact information
Charles Raux: LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Urban Toll and (un)Fairness: an Obstacle to an Experimentation in France? - With an attitude survey in Lyon, we test different principles of rationing car traffic by prices (road toll) or by quantities (odd numbers or reduced day of travelling). Rationing by price or by quantity is strongly perceived as unfair by responders. Attitudes towards tolls justified by the pollution caused by automobile traffic are less negative. On the compensation side, car-pooling should have free toll. Support for a reduced rate for low-income users means an equity position we have to answer.

Keywords: congestion de trafic; fiscalité du transport; péage urbain; consentement à payer; modèle probit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Revue Française d'Economie, 2011, 26 (2), pp.149-176. ⟨10.3917/rfe.112.0149⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Péage urbain et (in)justice perçue: un obstacle à l'expérimentation en France ? (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00733337

DOI: 10.3917/rfe.112.0149

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().