EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Replicating and Extending Soroka, Fournier, and Nir: Negative News Increases Arousal and Negative Affect

Roeland Dubèl, Gijs Schumacher, Maaike D. Homan, Delaney Peterson and Bert N. Bakker
Additional contact information
Roeland Dubèl: Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Gijs Schumacher: Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Maaike D. Homan: Organizational Behavior Group, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands
Delaney Peterson: Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Bert N. Bakker: Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Media and Communication, 2024, vol. 12

Abstract: The negativity bias hypothesis in political communication contends that people are more aroused by negative vs. positive news. Soroka et al. (2019) provide evidence for this negativity bias in a study in 17 countries across six continents. We find suggestive evidence for Soroka et al.’s (2019) central finding that negativity causes an increase in skin conductance levels in a conceptually close, well-powered, and preregistered replication. We extend Soroka et al. (2019) in three ways. First, we theorise, test, and confirm that negative (vs. positive) news causes an increase in activity of the corrugator major muscle above the eyebrow (using facial electromyography activity) and is associated with a negative affect. Second, we find people self-reporting negative news causes negative affect but that positive (instead of negative) news increases self-reported arousal. Third, we test Soroka et al.’s (2019) argument in another context, the Netherlands. Our article suggests that negative news is, especially, causing negative affect. Doing so, we contribute to the negativity bias argument in political communication research and, at the same time, show the importance of replication in empirical communication research.

Keywords: corrugator; negative news; negativity bias; physiology; skin conductance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7807 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:meanco:v12:y:2024:a:7807

DOI: 10.17645/mac.7807

Access Statistics for this article

Media and Communication is currently edited by Raquel Silva

More articles in Media and Communication from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v12:y:2024:a:7807