Unburdening the (Dis)Connected Individual? A Digital Disconnection Policy Paradox in Flanders (Belgium)

Tom De Leyn, Alice Verlinden, Laura Lemahieu, Lore Geldof, Marthe Mennes, Arturo Cocchi, Marijn Martens and Mariek Vanden Abeele
Additional contact information
Tom De Leyn: School of Social Sciences, Hasselt University, Belgium / imec-mict-ugent, Ghent University, Belgium
Alice Verlinden: Department of Work and Organization Studies, KU Leuven, Belgium
Laura Lemahieu: Department of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Lore Geldof: Department of Work and Organization Studies, KU Leuven, Belgium / Department of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Marthe Mennes: imec-mict-ugent, Ghent University, Belgium / Department of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Arturo Cocchi: imec-mict-ugent, Ghent University, Belgium
Marijn Martens: imec-mict-ugent, Ghent University, Belgium
Mariek Vanden Abeele: imec-mict-ugent, Ghent University, Belgium

Media and Communication, 2024, vol. 12

Abstract: The concept of digital disconnection, which refers to limiting digital media use for the sake of one’s well-being, has gained prominence in scholarly and public debates. Compared to a burgeoning digital disconnection industry that commodifies individuals’ struggles with constant connectivity, the development of evidence-based disconnection policies and regulations that support individuals to maintain digital well-being lags behind. The absence of digital disconnection policy may partly be due to a lack of studies investigating the contextual and institutional conditions in which policies and regulations are designed, implemented, and received. The few studies that do shed light on these conditions show that politicians’ and policymakers’ responses to digitalization involve discourses of individual responsibilization. Building on these insights, our study draws from in-depth interviews with 21 experts from organizations in Flanders (Belgium) who are responsible for digital well-being and digital disconnection across work, school, and family contexts. In particular, we have explored their perspectives on the challenges of constructing and implementing digital disconnection policies and regulations. Overall, the experts’ discourses reveal a conflict between striving for autonomy and the need for regulations concerning digital disconnection. This conflict leads to a digital disconnection policy paradox in which experts advocate for collective disconnection initiatives but ultimately resort to solutions on an individual level. We discuss the implications of our findings for the scholarly field of digital disconnection as well as for media policymakers.

Keywords: agency; digital disconnection; digital well-being; digitalization; media policy; neoliberalism; regulations; responsibilization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/8588 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:meanco:v12:y:2024:a:8588

DOI: 10.17645/mac.8588

Access Statistics for this article

Media and Communication is currently edited by Raquel Silva

More articles in Media and Communication from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().