EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Effects of a News Literacy Video on News Literacy Perceptions and Misinformation Evaluation

Rita Tang, Melissa Tully, Leticia Bode and Emily K. Vraga
Additional contact information
Rita Tang: Hubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, USA
Melissa Tully: School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Iowa, USA
Leticia Bode: Communication, Culture, and Technology Program, Georgetown University, USA
Emily K. Vraga: Hubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, USA

Media and Communication, 2025, vol. 13

Abstract: The mixing of misinformation with high-quality news and information on social media has reinvigorated interest in the value of news literacy (NL) to build audience resiliency to misinformation. Optimizing NL messages for social media environments—where they may be seen alongside misinformation—allows these messages to reach audiences when they are most likely to benefit from them. Using a 2 (NL video vs. control video) x 2 (sunscreen promotion video vs. sunscreen misinformation video) online survey experiment ( N = 780), we examine whether exposure to an NL video improves perceived personal NL skills and value for news literacy, as well as enables participants to recognize and avoid engaging with misinformation. Our findings suggest that after watching the NL video, individuals valued NL more but their self-perceived news literacy did not improve. Furthermore, watching the NL video made individuals rate the second video as less credible and reduced engagement with it no matter whether the second video contained misinformation or quality information. This research has several important implications. While watching an NL video could protect individuals by discrediting and decreasing engagement with misinformation, it may do so at the expense of high-quality information. We discuss the difficulty in designing NL messages that lead people to be appropriately skeptical and able to discern between high- and low-quality health information, rather than cynically disengaging with media content altogether.

Keywords: health information; media literacy; misinformation; news literacy; skepticism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/8983 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:meanco:v13:y:2025:a:8983

DOI: 10.17645/mac.8983

Access Statistics for this article

Media and Communication is currently edited by Raquel Silva

More articles in Media and Communication from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v13:y:2025:a:8983