Shining Light on “Dark Science”: Mapping the Field of Science Watchdog Journalism

Aljosha Karim Schapals, Michelle Riedlinger, Silvia Montaña-Niño and Artem Rednikin
Additional contact information
Aljosha Karim Schapals: School of Communication, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Michelle Riedlinger: School of Communication, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Silvia Montaña-Niño: School of Culture and Communication, University of Melbourne, Australia
Artem Rednikin: School of Communication, Queensland University of Technology, Australia

Media and Communication, 2026, vol. 14

Abstract: The journalistic watchdog role has traditionally been theorised as a mechanism for scrutinising political power. Yet comparatively little scholarly attention has been paid to watchdog practices that target science itself, despite growing concerns about research misconduct, misinformation, and the misuse of scientific authority in digital media environments. This study addresses this gap by conceptualising and mapping the emerging ecosystem of science watchdog journalism. Building on literature in journalism studies, science communication, and research integrity, the study defines science watchdog journalism as forms of journalistic and journalism-related scrutiny that monitors the production, communication, and use of scientific knowledge. Empirically, the study adopts an inductive mapping approach to identify actors engaged in science watchdog practices across contemporary platformised media environments. Drawing on case-based analysis, media monitoring, and multi-platform searches, we identified that actors are operating in a diverse science watchdog ecosystem that extends far beyond traditional investigative journalism. Science watchdog functions are increasingly performed by a broad range of actors, including research-integrity specialists, fact-checking organisations, advocacy groups, and highly visible individual commentators. Five primary watchdog functions are identified: primary investigative watchdogs, infrastructural watchdog platforms, translational intermediaries, corrective verification organisations, and attention-based watchdogs. Importantly, the study expands beyond Western media systems, highlighting watchdog initiatives operating across multiple global regions. By conceptualising science watchdog journalism and systematically mapping its actors and functions, the study contributes to journalism theory by proposing a broader understanding of watchdog practices in an era of platformised media and contested scientific authority.

Keywords: investigative journalism; misinformation detection; peripheral actors; research integrity; science communication; scientific misconduct; watchdog journalism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/12392 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:12392

DOI: 10.17645/mac.12392

Access Statistics for this article

Media and Communication is currently edited by Raquel Silva

More articles in Media and Communication from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().