Between Self-Regulation and Participatory Monitoring: Comparing Digital News Media Accountability Practices in Spain

Pedro-Luis Pérez-Díaz, Rocío Zamora Medina and Enrique Arroyas Langa
Additional contact information
Pedro-Luis Pérez-Díaz: Department of Journalism, Catholic University of Murcia, Spain
Rocío Zamora Medina: Department of Journalism, University of Murcia, Spain
Enrique Arroyas Langa: Department of Journalism, Catholic University of Murcia, Spain

Media and Communication, 2020, vol. 8, issue 2, 112-123

Abstract: In recent years, the accountability practices of digital journalism have gone from constituting an intimate and self-regulatory system of journalistic culture to a complex process that is increasingly external and open to the public (Fengler, Eberwein, Mazzoleni, Porlezza, & Russ-Mohl, 2014; Suárez-Villegas, Rodríguez-Martínez, Mauri-Ríos, & López-Meri, 2017). In this context, values and goals may remain diverse, arguably linked to idiosyncratic elements which often open a gap between traditional and more contemporary newsroom models. Following a qualitative approach, this study examines online media accountability instruments from a functional perspective, dividing its influence in three temporal phases of news production (Heikkilä et al., 2012). In this way, instruments that hold journalists responsible for their work are explored in four leading online news media from Spain: two digital native outlets ( Eldiario.es and ElConfidencial.com ) and two legacy outlets ( ElPais.com and ElMundo.es ). In addition to this observation, in-depth interviews are conducted with staff members in charge of audience management to explore the inner routines and protocols that determine the efficacy of such aspirations. Our work reveals the preponderant role of instruments focused on the actor and production transparency that the studied media implement to fulfill their responsibility, especially when compared with the weakened self-regulation instruments. The answers of the interviewees stress the difficulties they face in managing participatory forms of accountability and disclose tensions between different strategies, as well as other structural factors that are discussed as essential for the consolidation of these deontological initiatives.

Keywords: citizen participation; deontology; digital journalism; journalism ethics; journalistic culture; media accountability; self-regulation; transparency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2721 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:2:p:112-123

DOI: 10.17645/mac.v8i2.2721

Access Statistics for this article

Media and Communication is currently edited by Raquel Silva

More articles in Media and Communication from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().