A Computational Approach to Analyzing the Twitter Debate on Gaming Disorder

Tim Schatto-Eckrodt, Robin Janzik, Felix Reer, Svenja Boberg and Thorsten Quandt
Additional contact information
Tim Schatto-Eckrodt: University of Münster, Department of Communication, Germany
Robin Janzik: University of Münster, Department of Communication, Germany
Felix Reer: University of Münster, Department of Communication, Germany
Svenja Boberg: University of Münster, Department of Communication, Germany
Thorsten Quandt: University of Münster, Department of Communication, Germany

Media and Communication, 2020, vol. 8, issue 3, 205-218

Abstract: The recognition of excessive forms of media entertainment use (such as uncontrolled video gaming or the use of social networking sites) as a disorder is a topic widely discussed among scientists and therapists, but also among politicians, journalists, users, and the industry. In 2018, when the World Health Organization (WHO) decided to include the addictive use of digital games (gaming disorder) as a diagnosis in the International Classification of Diseases, the debate reached a new peak. In the current article, we aim to provide insights into the public debate on gaming disorder by examining data from Twitter for 11 months prior to and 8 months after the WHO decision, analyzing the (change in) topics, actors, and sentiment over time. Automated content analysis revealed that the debate is organic and not driven by spam accounts or other overly active ‘power users.’ The WHO announcement had a major impact on the debate, moving it away from the topics of parenting and child welfare, largely by activating actors from gaming culture. The WHO decision also resulted in a major backlash, increasing negative sentiments within the debate.

Keywords: addiction; content analysis; entertainment research; games; gaming disorder; social media (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3128 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:3:p:205-218

DOI: 10.17645/mac.v8i3.3128

Access Statistics for this article

Media and Communication is currently edited by Raquel Silva

More articles in Media and Communication from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().