Framing Nuclearity: Online Media Discourses in Lithuania
Natalija Mažeikienė,
Judita Kasperiūnienė and
Ilona Tandzegolskienė
Additional contact information
Natalija Mažeikienė: Faculty of Social Sciences, Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania
Judita Kasperiūnienė: Faculty of Informatics, Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania
Ilona Tandzegolskienė: Academy of Education, Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania
Media and Communication, 2021, vol. 9, issue 2, 150-161
Abstract:
This article refers to the concept of nuclearity as a broader technopolitical phenomenon that implies a political and cultural configuration of technical and scientific matters. The nuclear media discourses become a site of tensions, struggles, and power relations between various institutions, social groups, and agents who seek to frame nuclear issues. The Bourdieusian concept of a field as a domain of social interaction is employed by the authors of this article seeking to reveal interactions and power configurations within and between several fields: journalism and media, economy, politics, and cultural production fields (cinematography, literature, and art). Commercial and political pressures on media raise a question about the autonomy of this field. Media coverage of nuclear issues in Lithuania during the period 2018–2020, includes media framing produced by different sponsors of the nuclear media discourses and agents from the above-mentioned fields of journalism, nuclear industry, politics, cinematography or arts. The media coverage includes the news and press releases produced within PR and public communication of the atomic energy industry by representing the decommissioning of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant, articles written by journalists about the atomic city Visaginas, and challenges faced by the local community due to the closure of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant. The nuclear discourse includes debates by politicians around the topic of the lack of safety of the construction of the Astravyets Nuclear Power Plant in Belarus, and media coverage of the HBO series Chernobyl representing a strong antinuclear narrative by portraying the Chernobyl disaster crisis and expressing strong criticism of communism. The authors of this article carried out a qualitative content analysis of media coverage on nuclear issues and revealed features of the discourse: interpretative packages, frames, framing devices (Gamson & Modigliani, 1989), and dominating actors and institutions supporting the discourse.
Keywords: Astravyets nuclear power plant; Chernobyl; framing theory; Ignalina nuclear power plant; nuclear culture; nuclear imagery; nuclear media discourses; nuclearity; Visaginas (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3818 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:meanco:v9:y:2021:i:2:p:150-161
DOI: 10.17645/mac.v9i2.3818
Access Statistics for this article
Media and Communication is currently edited by Raquel Silva
More articles in Media and Communication from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().