Algorithmic or Human Source? Examining Relative Hostile Media Effect With a Transformer-Based Framework
Chenyan Jia and
Ruibo Liu
Additional contact information
Chenyan Jia: Moody College of Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, USA
Ruibo Liu: Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, USA
Media and Communication, 2021, vol. 9, issue 4, 170-181
Abstract:
The relative hostile media effect suggests that partisans tend to perceive the bias of slanted news differently depending on whether the news is slanted in favor of or against their sides. To explore the effect of an algorithmic vs. human source on hostile media perceptions, this study conducts a 3 (author attribution: human, algorithm, or human-assisted algorithm) x 3 (news attitude: pro-issue, neutral, or anti-issue) mixed factorial design online experiment ( N = 511). This study uses a transformer-based adversarial network to auto-generate comparable news headlines. The framework was trained with a dataset of 364,986 news stories from 22 mainstream media outlets. The results show that the relative hostile media effect occurs when people read news headlines attributed to all types of authors. News attributed to a sole human source is perceived as more credible than news attributed to two algorithm-related sources. For anti-Trump news headlines, there exists an interaction effect between author attribution and issue partisanship while controlling for people’s prior belief in machine heuristics. The difference of hostile media perceptions between the two partisan groups was relatively larger in anti-Trump news headlines compared with pro-Trump news headlines.
Keywords: algorithms; automated journalism; computational method; hostile media effect; source credibility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4164 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:meanco:v9:y:2021:i:4:p:170-181
DOI: 10.17645/mac.v9i4.4164
Access Statistics for this article
Media and Communication is currently edited by Raquel Silva
More articles in Media and Communication from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().