Annulment Actions and the V4: Taking Legislative Conflicts Before the CJEU

Marton Varju, Veronika Czina, Katalin Cseres and Ernő Várnay
Additional contact information
Marton Varju: Institute for Legal Studies, HUN‐REN Centre for Social Sciences, Hungary
Veronika Czina: Institute of World Economics, HUN‐REN Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungary
Katalin Cseres: Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ernő Várnay: Institute for Legal Studies, HUN‐REN Centre for Social Sciences, Hungary

Politics and Governance, 2024, vol. 12

Abstract: The EU member states have been using the action for annulment to challenge the legality of EU measures while pursuing a range of non-legal and essentially political motivations. This also holds for the V4 member states, which have also resorted to annulment actions to judicialize their legislative conflicts within the EU before the CJEU. Among the V4, Poland has been the most frequent litigant, using this institutional tool increasingly actively during the last 10 years. Poland’s behavior appears to confirm expectations of differentiation among this group of member states. It also coincides with a period of political change marked by deep legislative conflicts within the EU. The V4 annulment challenges against EU legislative measures usually made a genuine effort to achieve the legal objective of annulling the challenged legal act. However, there is evidence that they also pursued certain political motivations or a combination of them. These could include the securing of gains in domestic politics, avoiding the local costs of an EU policy misfit and/or promoting a preferred policy position, and/or influencing EU competence arrangements. In a few cases, the litigant member state aimed to avoid concrete material disadvantages. Securing a legal interpretation from the CJEU that would influence the behavior of other EU actors or clarify the law affecting the position of the applicant member state also motivated some of the V4 legal challenges.

Keywords: action for annulment; CJEU; European Union; legislative conflict; political motives; V4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/7473 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v12:y:2024:a:7473

DOI: 10.17645/pag.7473

Access Statistics for this article

Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia

More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().