Topic Diversity in Social Media Campaigning: A Study of the 2022 Australian Federal Election

Hannah Decker, Daniel Angus, Axel Bruns, Ehsan Dehghan, Phoebe Matich, Jane Tan and Laura Vodden
Additional contact information
Hannah Decker: Department of Human‐Centered Computing and Cognitive Science (HCCS), University of Duisburg‐Essen, Germany
Daniel Angus: Digital Media Research Center, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
Axel Bruns: Digital Media Research Center, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
Ehsan Dehghan: Digital Media Research Center, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
Phoebe Matich: Digital Media Research Center, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
Jane Tan: Digital Media Research Center, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
Laura Vodden: Digital Media Research Center, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

Politics and Governance, 2024, vol. 12

Abstract: This study explores the diversity of topics in political campaign communication on social media during the 2022 Australian federal election. While political campaigns on social media are often associated with both persuasive and mobilising appeals, this research focuses on understanding the differences in persuasive content by comparing organic (non-targeted) and paid (targeted) political communication. Analysing the Australian context, which follows a Westminster system, with compulsory voting, we utilise data from the federal election 2022 to investigate how political actors employ persuasive communication strategies. Through topic modelling, we examine whether distinct themes vary in content and prevalence between organic and paid social media content disseminated by political parties and candidates. Our analysis revealed that the differences in topic diversity between paid and organic content do not seem to be substantial, despite popular concerns about higher personalisation due to advertising targeting which could lead to information fragmentation of the electorate. Both types of content predominantly focus on core political topics, aligning with party ideologies and include overall campaign information (e.g., on election procedures). However, government critique emerges as a distinct topic in both organic and paid content signalling the usage of negative campaigning to weaken opposing parties. In conclusion, this study suggests that the strategic manipulation of the electorate through social media during the Australian federal election in 2022 was limited. Nonetheless, the prevalence of negative appeals towards the government and opposing parties raises questions about the potential impact on citizens’ trust in democracy and institutions.

Keywords: Australian federal election; persuasive communication; political advertising; social media campaigning; topic modelling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/8155 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v12:y:2024:a:8155

DOI: 10.17645/pag.8155

Access Statistics for this article

Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia

More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().