Destined for Balance? Centralized and Decentralized Approaches to AI Governance
Chenghao Sun and
Xiyan Chen
Additional contact information
Chenghao Sun: School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, China
Xiyan Chen: School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, China
Politics and Governance, 2025, vol. 13
Abstract:
The rapid development of AI and rising concerns over its ethical risks have driven states to adopt centralized or decentralized governance approaches. This article examines the factors influencing states’ choices of governance approaches. We hypothesized that states’ choices are influenced by three key variables: per capita gross national income, research and development (R&D) capacity, and the level of ethical risks. The fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method is adopted to analyze how these independent variables impact states’ governance choices. Our findings suggest that states that have higher income and stronger R&D capacity tend to adopt a more decentralized governance approach. On the contrary, if a state’s income level is high while its R&D capacity is weak, it is likely to take a more centralized approach. Also, there are situations in which states’ R&D capacity is relatively weak but their ethical risk level is comparatively high. These states usually employ a relatively centralized approach to ensure technological innovation and risk control. Generally, the influences of a state’s income level and R&D capacity outweigh the influence of its ethical risk level. Our framework is tested through case studies of the US, China, Germany, France, Singapore, India, Brazil, and Russia. Inspired by the governance choices of the deviant cases, we also found that a balanced governance approach can facilitate AI innovation while safeguarding human rights and freedom. This requires states to reallocate their governance power and achieve a balance between central and local governments, as well as public and private sectors.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; centralization; ethics; governance; research and development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10197 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:10197
DOI: 10.17645/pag.10197
Access Statistics for this article
Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia
More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().