The Moral and Political Legitimations of War and the Complex Dynamics of Peace Negotiation Processes

Alexander Yendell and Oliver Hidalgo
Additional contact information
Alexander Yendell: Research Institute Social Cohesion, Section Leipzig, Germany
Oliver Hidalgo: Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, University of Passau, Germany

Politics and Governance, 2025, vol. 13

Abstract: This thematic issue investigates the moral and political legitimations of war and the complex dynamics of peace negotiation processes in contemporary international politics. It brings together contributions from political science, sociology, international relations, and political psychology to examine how military interventions are justified, how peace is negotiated or prevented, and how legitimacy is constructed, challenged, and transformed over time. The articles address a wide range of empirical cases—from Afghanistan and Ukraine to Cyprus and Mozambique—while engaging with normative frameworks such as just war theory, root narrative theory, and theories of authoritarianism. Several contributions interrogate the discursive and institutional mechanisms through which states, elites, and publics justify war, be it through historical analogies, legal claims, national myths, or emotional appeals. Others highlight the psychological and ideological underpinnings of militarism, including collective narcissism, authoritarian submission, and gendered dispositions toward violence. One central theme running through the issue is the fragility of normative boundaries between aggression and defence, and how these are negotiated differently depending on regime type, political culture, and strategic interests. Particular attention is given to the interplay of moral reasoning, political communication, and affective dynamics in shaping public support for war. In doing so, this issue contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of how legitimacy is contested in wartime and peacebuilding contexts alike. It also offers critical reflections on the ethical limits of just war theories and the psychosocial conditions under which war becomes normatively acceptable to democratic societies.

Keywords: just war theory; masculinity; peace negotiations; political communication; political psychology; war justification; war legitimacy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/11315 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:11315

DOI: 10.17645/pag.11315

Access Statistics for this article

Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia

More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().