EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Are Single‐Party Voting Advice Applications Useful? Comparing Voter Preferences in the BSW‐O‐Mat With a Probability Sample

Jan Philipp Thomeczek
Additional contact information
Jan Philipp Thomeczek: Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Potsdam, Germany

Politics and Governance, 2026, vol. 14

Abstract:

As the voting advice application (VAA) market has grown increasingly competitive, developers have focused on innovation, including specialised VAAs that focus on specific topics. This article evaluates the analytical potential of a “single-party VAA” called BSW-O-Mat, a website developed to assess alignment with the newly founded German party Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW), attracting over 50,000 participants. Single-party VAAs face compounded selection bias; beyond the typical overrepresentation of educated politically engaged users, they disproportionately attract voters interested in the focal party. Despite over 50,000 responses, questions remain about data validity for estimating voter preferences. To address the usefulness of VAA data for analysing the new party’s supporters, this study examines convergence validity by comparing the average marginal effects from logistic regression models based on VAA data with those from the 2025 German Longitudinal Election Study’s (GLES) probability sample. Despite substantial overrepresentation of potential BSW supporters in the VAA sample, convergence in the direction of effects was observed across datasets. Effect correlations reached r = 0.65 (increasing to r = 0.87 when excluding non-converging effects), though the VAA dataset tends to overestimate effect sizes. Notably, even analysing substantially underrepresented AfD voters (5.5% in VAA vs 19.8% in GLES) yielded results largely consistent with probability-sample models. These findings demonstrate that the VAA data can provide valid insights when appropriately weighted and interpreted in light of self-selection biases.

Keywords: BSW; convergence validity; non‐probability sample; selection bias; VAAs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/11241 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11241

DOI: 10.17645/pag.11241

Access Statistics for this article

Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia

More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().

 
Page updated 2026-01-09
Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11241