Mission Green: Defense, Decarbonization, and the Politics of Transformative Mission‐Oriented Innovation Policy
Carlos Cantafio Apitz,
Darius Ornston and
Trang Thu Nguyen
Additional contact information
Carlos Cantafio Apitz: Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto, Canada
Darius Ornston: Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto, Canada
Trang Thu Nguyen: Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto, Canada
Politics and Governance, 2026, vol. 14
Abstract:
The urgency of decarbonization has generated increasing interest in using mission-oriented innovation policies to achieve net-zero emissions. An energy transformation, however, requires managing a much more complex portfolio of supply- and demand-side initiatives than traditional, “linear” missions. “Transformative” innovation policy thus poses a formidable administrative and political challenge, particularly for large, federal, liberal market economies. Leveraging variation in state capacity within the US, we find that the Department of Defense is better positioned to pursue transformative, green innovation policies than the Department of Energy, despite the latter’s central position in national decarbonization efforts. Specifically, the Department of Defense’s scale and scope enable it to coordinate across a wide array of policy instruments, actors, and priorities. Whereas efforts to endow the Department of Energy with similar capacities sparked a backlash, the Department of Defense’s bipartisan mandate to confront geotech challenges and its ability to leverage secrecy have insulated it from political interference. In illustrating how one large, liberal polity has succeeded (and struggled) in pursuing decarbonization, we highlight the distinct administrative and political capabilities which underpin transformative innovation policy, the tension between them, and one strategy to soften this tradeoff.
Keywords: decarbonization; Department of Defense; geotech; green industrial policy; innovation; mission‐oriented innovation policy; security; state capacity; sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/11244 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11244
DOI: 10.17645/pag.11244
Access Statistics for this article
Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia
More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().