Measuring Issue Congruence in Western Europe: How Voting Advice Applications Compare to Expert‐ and Manifesto‐Based Estimates

Mattia Gatti
Additional contact information
Mattia Gatti: Department of Political Science, LUISS University, Italy

Politics and Governance, 2026, vol. 14

Abstract: Do congruence estimates derived from different sources converge? A growing number of scholars are studying party–voter congruence in a comparative perspective, increasingly focusing on specific issues that depart from the general left–right dimension. When doing so, however, they often encounter a missing-data problem: Researchers must combine citizen preferences and party positions derived from distinct sources, frequently presenting different question formats, wordings, and scales. This exacerbates perceptual biases and requires demanding assumptions regarding the common understanding of issues between voters and experts. While multiple techniques have been proposed to address these issues, they remain burdensome and rarely used. Consequently, this article focuses on the most widely employed approaches to estimating party–voter issue congruence. I confront measures constructed by matching European Election Study voter preferences with expert (Chapel Hill Expert Survey) and Euromanifesto party position estimates against those generated by voting advice applications (VAAs)—specifically the euandi dataset—which present the benefit of measuring parties and voters on the same scale, with the same wording. Focusing on 60 party–voter dyads across 12 Western European countries in 2014, the results indicate clear divergence between estimates derived from manifesto data and those from VAAs. Correlations between VAAs and experts are consistently positive and significant, though moderate. These estimates do not seem to be driven by different sampling methods or quality filtering. Finally, an exploratory analysis on the sources of divergence finds that manifesto length, expert uncertainty, and party newness help explain some of the differences between congruence estimates.

Keywords: issue congruence; representation; voter–party linkages; voting advice applications (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/11259 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11259

DOI: 10.17645/pag.11259

Access Statistics for this article

Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia

More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().