(Re)Framing Coherence: A Relational Analysis of Social Protection Systems in South Africa and Uganda

Irene Among-Lutz
Additional contact information
Irene Among-Lutz: Institute of Development Research and Development Policy, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany / International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Politics and Governance, 2026, vol. 14

Abstract: Coherence is increasingly promoted in international social protection discourse as a remedy for fragmented systems, yet its meaning and application remain unresolved. In many Global South contexts, social protection systems evolve within multi-actor, donor-influenced environments, raising questions about how coherence is framed, negotiated, and applied. This article examines how international–domestic actor relations shape coherence in social protection systems. It reconceptualises coherence as a relational governance practice rather than a binary system attribute. The article develops a legal, policy, and administrative actor-driven analytical framework to trace how coherence is conceived, invoked, and applied in South Africa’s and Uganda’s social protection systems. Drawing on elite interviews and document analysis, the analysis shows that international actors mobilise coherence in mandate-specific ways. Multilaterals frame coherence as a technocratic response to fragmentation; UN agencies invoke it as a normative, rights-based ideal; and bilateral donors deploy it as a pragmatic tool for system-building. These framings do not converge as they enter national discourse; instead, they are translated in line with the domestic political economy and legal constraints. Domestic actors deploy coherence across various operational rationales, producing distinct patterns of (in)coherence. In South Africa, social protection subsystems are legally embedded yet functionally siloed, whereas in Uganda, coherence is mobilised through donor-driven projects that produce parallel, fragmented systems. Overall coherence emerges as a negotiated, context-dependent process, which helps explain why fragmentation persists despite repeated reform efforts.

Keywords: domestic actors; international actors; policy coherence; policy diffusion; social protection systems; South Africa; Uganda (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/11298 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11298

DOI: 10.17645/pag.11298

Access Statistics for this article

Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia

More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().