When Populists Win but Are Excluded From Power: Explaining Post‐Electoral Dynamics of Democratic Satisfaction
Julia Partheymüller and
Sylvia Kritzinger
Additional contact information
Julia Partheymüller: Department of Government, University of Vienna, Austria
Sylvia Kritzinger: Department of Government, University of Vienna, Austria
Politics and Governance, 2026, vol. 14
Abstract:
This article investigates the dynamics of satisfaction with democracy when a populist party wins an election but is subsequently excluded from governing. While classic research highlights winner–loser gaps as a key determinant of democratic satisfaction, we argue that under proportional representation, especially in times of rising populism, post-electoral dynamics unfold in two distinct stages shaped not only by electoral results but also by coalition bargaining. We examine this argument with a case study of the 2024 Austrian parliamentary election, in which the populist radical right Freedom Party (FPÖ) won a plurality of votes yet was excluded from government following the longest coalition negotiations in Austrian history. Using data from the AUTNES Online Panel Study, which features two post-electoral panel waves, we disentangle the effects of winner–loser perceptions, populist attitudes, democratic norms, and evaluations of procedural fairness. Our findings show that electoral victory did not increase satisfaction with democracy among FPÖ voters, largely due to their low confidence in electoral integrity and strong populist attitudes, which reinforced dissatisfaction. After coalition formation, weak democratic norms regarding the acceptance of unfavorable democratic decisions, together with the perception that excluding the plurality winner was procedurally unfair, contributed to a further decline, reaching a new low point. By demonstrating how orientations towards electoral and post-electoral outcomes and processes shape democratic attitudes, this study provides a more nuanced understanding of satisfaction with democracy in proportional systems amid rising challenges to democratic legitimacy.
Keywords: coalition bargaining; democratic norms; electoral integrity; panel data; procedural fairness; satisfaction with democracy; winner–loser perceptions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/11828 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11828
DOI: 10.17645/pag.11828
Access Statistics for this article
Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia
More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().