Co‐Governance of Nature‐based Solutions for Just Urban Food Futures: From Global Evidence to Local Practice

Philipp Montenegro, Sara Maia and Andresa Lêdo Marques
Additional contact information
Philipp Montenegro: International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, Sweden
Sara Maia: Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University, Austria
Andresa Lêdo Marques: Institute of Social Sciences (ICS), University of Lisbon, Portugal

Politics and Governance, 2027, vol. 15

Abstract: Urban food-growing initiatives, ranging from community gardens to networks of backyards, have gained attention within urban food policy as nature-based solutions (NbS) capable of delivering food security, social, and environmental benefits. Yet as the 2030 horizon for global sustainability and urban food governance agendas approaches, concerns persist that existing governance arrangements remain ill-equipped to address deep-seated power inequalities, food insecurity, and social injustice. This article examines how justice and resilience materialise through co-governance in food-growing NbS. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyse 390 NbS projects from the Urban Nature Atlas NATURESCAPES dataset to identify patterns across food-growing NbS and combine these findings with qualitative insights from two emblematic cases: the backyard garden network Patios Productivos in Cartagena (Colombia), and the Horta Nova Horticultural Park in Lisbon (Portugal). These cases embody the predominant bottom-up and multi-actor governance dynamics identified across food-growing NbS. Drawing on the five A’s co-governance framework—Authority, Agency, Arrangement, Alignment, and Accomplishment—we examine how power, recognition, and justice are negotiated over time. Our findings reveal that food-growing NbS overwhelmingly emerge as community-led responses to socio-economic vulnerability and exhibit distinctive governance patterns shaped by context-specific collaborations, long-term partnerships, and the balance between community autonomy and institutional recognition. We argue that community-led food NbS function as transformative social infrastructures, and that justice and resilience are co-produced through contested governance arrangements. By foregrounding power and co-governance, this article contributes to debates on urban food politics and helps advance a just post-2030 urban food governance agenda.

Keywords: co‐governance; collaborative governance; community‐led initiatives; food security; justice; nature‐based solutions; resilience; urban agriculture; urban food governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2027
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/12669 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v15:y:2027:a:12669

DOI: 10.17645/pag.12669

Access Statistics for this article

Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia

More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().