The Devil’s in the Details: Evaluating the One Person, One Vote Principle in American Politics

Jeffrey W. Ladewig and Seth C. McKee
Additional contact information
Jeffrey W. Ladewig: Department of Political Science, University of Connecticut, 365 Fairfield Way, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
Seth C. McKee: Department of Political Science, Texas Tech University , 113 Holden Hall, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA

Politics and Governance, 2014, vol. 2, issue 1, 4-31

Abstract: Ever since the Supreme Court instituted the one person, one vote principle in congressional elections based on its decision in Wesberry v. Sanders (1964), intrastate deviations from equal district populations have become smaller and smaller after each decennial reapportionment. Relying on equal total population as the standard to meet the Court’s principle, though, has raised some constitutional and practical questions stemming from, most basically, not every person has the right to vote. Specifically, there is considerable deviation between the current redistricting practices and a literal interpretation of this constitutional principle. This study systematically analyzes the differences between districts’ total populations and their voting age populations (VAPs). Further, we consider how congressional reapportionments since 1972 would change if, instead of states’ total populations, the standard for reapportioning seats were based on the VAP or the voting eligible population (VEP). Overall, the results indicate that the debate surrounding the appropriate apportionment and redistricting standard is not just normative, it also has notable practical consequences.

Keywords: equal population; malapportionment; reapportionment; redistricting; U.S. House elections; voting eligible population; voting age population (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/18 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v2:y:2014:i:1:p:4-31

DOI: 10.17645/pag.v2i1.18

Access Statistics for this article

Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia

More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().