Understanding Mass Atrocity Prevention during Periods of Democratic Transition
Stephen McLoughlin
Additional contact information
Stephen McLoughlin: Centre for Governance and Public Policy, Griffith University, Australia
Politics and Governance, 2015, vol. 3, issue 3, 27-41
Abstract:
The purpose of this article is to provide a better understanding of why some countries experience mass atrocities during periods of democratic transition, while others do not. Scholars have long regarded democracy as an important source of stability and protection from mass atrocities such as genocide, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing. But democratic transition itself is fraught with the heightened risk of violent conflict and even mass atrocities. Indeed, a number of studies have identified regimes in transition as containing the highest risk of political instability and mass atrocities. What is overlooked is the question of how and why some regimes undergo such transitions without experiencing mass atrocities, despite the presence of a number of salient risk factors, including state-based discrimination, inter-group tension and horizontal inequality. Utilizing a new analytical framework, this article investigates this lacuna by conducting a comparative analysis of two countries—one that experienced atrocities (Burundi) during transition, and one that did not (Guyana). How countries avoid such violence during transition has the potential to yield insights for the mitigation of risk associated with mass atrocity crimes.
Keywords: Burundi; democratic transition; Guyana; mass atrocities; prevention; risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/318 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v3:y:2015:i:3:p:27-41
DOI: 10.17645/pag.v3i3.318
Access Statistics for this article
Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia
More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().