Genocide Prevention and Western National Security: The Limitations of Making R2P All About Us
Maureen S. Hiebert
Additional contact information
Maureen S. Hiebert: Department of Political Science and Centre for Military Security and Strategic Studies, University of Calgary, Canada
Politics and Governance, 2015, vol. 3, issue 4, 12-25
Abstract:
The case for turning R2P and genocide prevention from principle to practice usually rests on the invocation of moral norms and duties to others. Calls have been made by some analysts to abandon this strategy and “sell” genocide prevention to government by framing it as a matter of our own national interest including our security. Governments’ failure to prevent atrocities abroad, it is argued, imperils western societies at home. If we look at how the genocide prevention-as-national security argument has been made we can see, however, that this position is not entirely convincing. I review two policy reports that make the case for genocide prevention based in part on national security considerations: Preventing Genocide: A Blue Print for U.S. Policymakers (Albright-Cohen Report); and the Will to Intervene Project . I show that both reports are problematic for two reasons: the “widened” traditional security argument advocated by the authors is not fully substantiated by the evidence provided in the reports; and alternate conceptions of security that would seem to support the linking of genocide prevention to western security—securitization and risk and uncertain—do not provide a solid logical foundation for operationalizing R2P. I conclude by considering whether we might appeal instead to another form of self interest, “reputational stakes”, tied to western states’ construction of their own identity as responsible members of the international community.
Keywords: genocide; national security; prevention; R2P (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/317 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v3:y:2015:i:4:p:12-25
DOI: 10.17645/pag.v3i4.317
Access Statistics for this article
Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia
More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().