Emerging Governance Architectures in Global Health: Do Metagovernance Norms Explain Inter-Organisational Convergence?

Anna Holzscheiter, Thurid Bahr and Laura Pantzerhielm
Additional contact information
Anna Holzscheiter: Department of Political and Social Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, Junior Research Group Governance for Global Health, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, and WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Germany
Thurid Bahr: Department of Political and Social Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, Junior Research Group Governance for Global Health, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, and WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Germany
Laura Pantzerhielm: Junior Research Group Governance for Global Health, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, and WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Germany

Politics and Governance, 2016, vol. 4, issue 3, 5-19

Abstract: This paper proposes a theoretical account of institutional transformation and the emergence of order in global inter-organisational relations, which is centred on the concept of “metagovernance”. It does so by theorising on the advent of governance architectures in global health governance—relationships between international organisations (IOs) in this field that are stable over time. Global health governance is routinely portrayed as an exceptionally fragmented field of international cooperation with a perceived lack of synergy and choreography between international and transnational organisations. However, our paper starts from the observation that there are also movements of convergence between international organisations. We seek to explain these by looking at the effects of international norms that define good global governance as orderly and harmonised global governance. We conceptualize such norms as “metagovernance norms” that are enacted in reflexive practices which govern and order the relationships between international organisations. Empirically, this paper traces changing interactions and institutional arrangements between IOs (World Health Organization; World Bank; Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria) in global health governance since the late 1940s and shows how patterns therein reflect and (re)produce broader discursive perceptions of what “health” is about and how the governance thereof ought to be organised.

Keywords: discourses; global health; international organisations; metagovernance; norms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/566 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v4:y:2016:i:3:p:5-19

DOI: 10.17645/pag.v4i3.566

Access Statistics for this article

Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia

More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().