Scrutinizing Virtual Citizen Involvement in Planning: Ten Applications of an Online Participatory Tool

Mattias Hjerpe, Erik Glaas and Sofie Storbjörk
Additional contact information
Mattias Hjerpe: Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Department of Thematic Studies―Environmental Change, Linköping University, Sweden
Erik Glaas: Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Department of Thematic Studies―Environmental Change, Linköping University, Sweden
Sofie Storbjörk: Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Department of Thematic Studies―Environmental Change, Linköping University, Sweden

Politics and Governance, 2018, vol. 6, issue 3, 159-169

Abstract: How to organize citizen participation in planning is continuously debated. The amount of Online Participatory Tools (OPTs) to facilitate inclusive and efficient participation has increased. While studies have assessed their functionality, usability and effectiveness in planning, they have rarely analyzed OPTs beyond single-cases, targeted tools that are widely used or assessed how OPTs affect broader values of participation. Targeting this absence, this study analyzes how ten applications of a widely used OPT, CityPlanner™, affect the normative, substantive and instrumental values of citizen participatory planning in Swedish cities. By analyzing 1,354 citizen proposals and interviewing urban planners, we find that citizens more extensively submit proposals and initiate debates on planning when using the OPT. Results suggest a more even age and gender distribution among proposal users than with conventional methods, facilitating normative values of participation. The OPT was generally applied early in planning and generated high-quality inputs. Our results, however, nuance previous analyses by also emphasizing the importance of place-specificity of OPT applications and of joint participation strategies among departments. Key for OPT development includes the need to improve their ability to analyze overarching trends among inputs.

Keywords: citizen participation; governance; online participatory tools; planning; visualization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1481 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v6:y:2018:i:3:p:159-169

DOI: 10.17645/pag.v6i3.1481

Access Statistics for this article

Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia

More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().