The Regime of Self‐Optimization: Lived Experiences of Enforced Digital Inclusion by Low‐Literate Citizens

Alexander Smit, Joëlle Swart and Marcel Broersma
Additional contact information
Alexander Smit: Centre for Media and Journalism Studies, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Joëlle Swart: Centre for Media and Journalism Studies, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Marcel Broersma: Centre for Media and Journalism Studies, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Social Inclusion, 2025, vol. 13

Abstract: This article introduces the regime of self‐optimization, a theoretical framework to understand how disadvantaged citizens are compelled to continually improve their digital skills and capacities to meet the demands of an increasingly digital welfare state. Consequently, we ask: How do low‐literate Dutch citizens experience the regime of self‐optimization in their everyday lives? Drawing on historical and discursive underpinnings of governmentality, responsibilization, and standardization, we propose a conceptual framework to examine how top‐down digital norms impose moral and practical obligations for self‐optimization. We distinguish two dimensions of self‐optimization: a vertical and horizontal mode. The first emphasizes extrinsic norms, efficiency, and personal responsibility, effectively attributing digital exclusion to personal failure while overlooking more profound structural barriers. The latter centers around intrinsic motivations, social support structures, trust, and context‐sensitive adaptation, thereby fostering inclusion and agency, although its effectiveness depends on social resources. Drawing on a longitudinal ethnographic study conducted in libraries, a community center, and a vocational school in the Netherlands (41 participant observations; 23 semi‐structured interviews), our findings show how these competing dimensions collide in the everyday lives of low‐literate Dutch citizens, revealing frictions that highlight broader socio‐political tensions in digitized welfare systems. These tensions highlight how the mechanisms intended to foster digital inclusion, by encouraging citizens to optimize themselves, can instead reinforce marginalization. By centering the experiences of marginalized groups, researchers and policymakers can more effectively address socio‐economic, linguistic, and cultural barriers to digital inclusion. This challenges the assumption that universalized digital inclusion initiatives are sufficient for all citizens. The regime of self‐optimization, thus, provides insights for designing human‐centered, context‐sensitive digital inclusion interventions in rapidly digitizing societies.

Keywords: digital inclusion; digital exclusion; digital inequality; digital literacy; low literacy; disadvantaged citizens; self‐optimization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/10052 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:10052

DOI: 10.17645/si.10052

Access Statistics for this article

Social Inclusion is currently edited by Mariana Pires

More articles in Social Inclusion from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().