Challenges in the Transition From Apprenticeships to Higher Education in England, Germany, and Norway

Johannes Karl Schmees, Tim Migura, Bill Esmond, Dietmar Frommberger and Eli Smeplass
Additional contact information
Johannes Karl Schmees: Institute of Education & Skills, University of Derby, UK
Tim Migura: Institute of Education, Vocational and Business Education, Osnabrück University, Germany
Bill Esmond: Institute of Education & Skills, University of Derby, UK
Dietmar Frommberger: Institute of Education, Vocational and Business Education, Osnabrück University, Germany
Eli Smeplass: Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

Social Inclusion, 2025, vol. 13

Abstract: The transition from technical and vocational education and training to higher education is particularly challenging for apprenticeship graduates. These challenges are not only bureaucratic or logistical but also reflect deeper systemic inequalities. In many countries, apprenticeship routes at the upper secondary level are disproportionately chosen by disadvantaged groups in relation to class, gender, and/or race. As a result, the limited, time‐consuming, and inconsistently regulated progression pathways in place contribute to the reproduction of social inequality. This article examines how such structural barriers are embedded in three national apprenticeship models in England, Germany, and Norway, where access to apprenticeship qualifications is primarily mediated by the labour market. In England, higher‐level apprenticeship routes combine company‐based learning with part‐time participation in institutional education. In Germany, the parallel or “dual” model integrates school‐based and company‐based training, while Norway’s sequential model structures apprenticeships as successive phases in schools and workplaces. In comparing these models, we conclude that despite differences across transition routes and claims to improve permeability, the divide between vocational and academic education persists across all three systems, thereby reinforcing rather than reducing systemic inequality.

Keywords: case study; comparative analysis; cross‐national; higher education; pathways; permeability; transition; TVET (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/9774 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:9774

DOI: 10.17645/si.9774

Access Statistics for this article

Social Inclusion is currently edited by Mariana Pires

More articles in Social Inclusion from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().