What Are the Structural Barriers to Planning for Later Life? A Scoping Review of the Literature

Claire Preston, Nick Drydakis, Suzanna Forwood, Suzanne Hughes and Catherine Meads
Additional contact information
Claire Preston: Humanities and Social Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, UK
Suzanna Forwood: Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, UK
Suzanne Hughes: Nursing and Midwifery, Anglia Ruskin University, UK
Catherine Meads: Nursing and Midwifery, Anglia Ruskin University, UK

Social Inclusion, 2019, vol. 7, issue 3, 17-26

Abstract: The rollback of the welfare state in countries such as the UK, coupled with population ageing, have contributed to a situation in which responsibility for older people’s wellbeing is placed more heavily on the individual. This is exemplified in the notion in popular and policy circles that individuals should plan for later life, particularly financially, and a corresponding concern that they are not doing so sufficiently. This scoping review aimed to identify the structural factors which inhibit people from engaging in planning for later life. For the purposes of this review, we characterised planning as the range of activities people deliberately pursue with the aim of achieving desired outcomes in later life. This entails a future, as opposed to shorter-term, goal orientation. In study selection, we focused on planning at mid-life (aged 40 to 60). Systematic and snowball searching identified 2,317 studies, of which 36 were included in the final qualitative synthesis. The review found that limited financial resources were a key barrier to planning. Related factors included: living in rented accommodation, informal caring, and working part-time. A lack of support from employers, industry, regulators and landlords was also found to inhibit planning. The findings suggest that certain sections of society are effectively excluded from planning. This is particularly problematic if popular and policy discourse comes to blame individuals for failing to plan. The review also provides a critical perspective on planning, highlighting a tendency in the literature towards individualistic and productivist interpretations of the concept.

Keywords: ageing; later life; mid-life; older people; planning; retirement; scoping review; structural barriers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1883 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:socinc:v7:y:2019:i:3:p:17-26

DOI: 10.17645/si.v7i3.1883

Access Statistics for this article

Social Inclusion is currently edited by Mariana Pires

More articles in Social Inclusion from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().