Bridge over Troubled Water: Linking Capacities of Sport and Non-Sport Organizations

Mathieu Marlier, Bram Constandt, Cleo Schyvinck, Thomas De Bock, Mathieu Winand and Annick Willem
Additional contact information
Mathieu Marlier: Department of International Sport Management, LUNEX International University of Health, Exercise, and Sports, Luxembourg / Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
Bram Constandt: Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
Cleo Schyvinck: Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
Thomas De Bock: Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
Mathieu Winand: Department of International Sport Management, LUNEX International University of Health, Exercise, and Sports, Luxembourg
Annick Willem: Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium

Social Inclusion, 2020, vol. 8, issue 3, 139-151

Abstract: Community Sport Development Programs (CSDPs) that use an intersectoral capacity building approach have shown potential in reaching individuals in disadvantaged situations. This study has investigated how the application of capacity building principles in disadvantaged communities results in higher sport participation rates in these communities. A multiple case design was used, including six similar disadvantaged communities in Antwerp, Belgium; four communities implemented the CSDP, two communities served as control communities without CSDP. In total, 52 face-to-face interviews were held with sport, social, health, cultural, and youth organizations in these communities. Four key findings were crucial to explain the success of the CSDP according to the principles of capacity building. First, the CSDP appeared to be the missing link between sport organizations on the one hand and health, social, youth, and cultural organizations on the other hand. Second, shifting from a sport-oriented staff to a mix of sport staff, social workers and representatives of people in disadvantaged situations helped increase trust through a participatory approach. Third, CSDPs assisted sport clubs to deal with financial, organizational, and cultural pressures that arose from the influx of new members in disadvantaged situations. Finally, the CSDPs developed well-planned and integrated strategies focusing on reinforcing the existing local organizations already using sport to reach their goals. These capacity building principles were key in attaining higher sport participation for people living in disadvantaged communities.

Keywords: capacity building; community sport; disadvantaged communities; intersectoral partnerships; sport participation; youth (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2465 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:socinc:v8:y:2020:i:3:p:139-151

DOI: 10.17645/si.v8i3.2465

Access Statistics for this article

Social Inclusion is currently edited by Mariana Pires

More articles in Social Inclusion from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().