A Note on Reece's Proportional-Loss Model

Brian Moores

British Journal of Political Science, 1987, vol. 17, issue 3, 379-384

Abstract: In a recent publication Reece proposes to substitute for the ‘swing’ method what he labels a proportional-loss model. Although his argument against the logic of the swing method is perfectly valid, this short Note will demonstrate that what he offers as a substitute is just as unsound intellectually.

Date: 1987
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:17:y:1987:i:03:p:379-384_00

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in British Journal of Political Science from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().