Are health problems systemic? Politics of access and choice under Beveridge and Bismarck systems
Zeynep Or (),
Chantal Cases (),
Ulrika Winblad and
Health Economics, Policy and Law, 2010, vol. 5, issue 03, 269-293
Industrialised countries face similar challenges for improving the performance of their health system. Nevertheless, the nature and intensity of the reforms required are largely determined by each country’s basic social security model. Most reforms in Beveridge-type systems have sought to increase choice and reduce waiting times while those in major Bismarck-type systems have focused on cost control by constraining the choice of providers. This paper looks at the main differences in performance of five countries and reviews their recent reform experience, focusing on three questions: Are there systematic differences in performance of Beveridge and Bismarck-type systems? What are the key parameters of healthcare system, which underlie these differences? Have recent reforms been effective?
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1744133110000034 link to article abstract page (text/html)
Working Paper: Are Health Problems Systemic? Politics of Access and Choice under Beveridge and Bismarck Systems (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:5:y:2010:i:03:p:269-293_00
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Health Economics, Policy and Law from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Keith Waters ().