Reply: Energy Accounting: The Case of Farm Machinery in Maryland

Phillips Foster and Dennis Wichelns

Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 1981, vol. 13, issue 1, 159-160

Abstract: The most important issue raised in the comment by Bradford involves the problem of how to handle the fact that, although the logical period for accounting for energy use on the farm is one year, farm machinery is typically used over a period of several years. No solution to this problem will be entirely satisfactory, and the alternative offered by Bradford has its own difficulties. Nevertheless, the Bradford alternative is worth trying, and this response to the comment will consider briefly his proposal.

Date: 1981
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:13:y:1981:i:01:p:159-160_02

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().