EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Expected Utility Analysis of Stocker Cattle Ownership Versus Contract Grazing in the Southeast

John Anderson, Curt Lacy, Charlie S. Forrest and Randall D. Little

Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 2004, vol. 36, issue 3, 719-730

Abstract: Stocker cattle ownership is compared to contract grazing using stochastic simulation. Returns are evaluated for both cattle owners and caretakers in contract grazing agreements. For caretakers, contract grazing is significantly less risky than cattle ownership. Slightly to moderately risk-averse caretakers could be expected to prefer some type of contract grazing to direct ownership of cattle. For cattle owners, contracting reduces risk only slightly while significantly reducing expected returns.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: Expected Utility Analysis of Stocker Cattle Ownership Versus Contract Grazing in the Southeast (2004) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:36:y:2004:i:03:p:719-730_02

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:36:y:2004:i:03:p:719-730_02