RISK AND RETURNS OF SPRING AND FALL CALVING FOR BEEF CATTLE IN TENNESSEE

Gavin W. Henry, Christopher Boyer, Andrew P. Griffith, James Larson (), Aaron Smith and Karen Lewis
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Karen Lewis DeLong

Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 2016, vol. 48, issue 3, 257-278

Abstract: We determined the profitability and risk for spring- and fall-calving beef cows in Tennessee. Simulation models were developed using 19 years of data and considered the seasonality of cattle prices and feed prices for least-cost feed rations to find a distribution of net returns for spring- and fall-calving seasons for two weaning months. Fall calving was more profitable than the spring calving for all feed rations and weaning months. Fall calving was also risk preferred over spring calving for all levels of risk aversion. Higher calf prices at weaning were the primary factor influencing the risk efficiency of fall calving.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: Risk and Returns of Spring and Fall Calving for Beef Cattle in Tennessee (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:48:y:2016:i:03:p:257-278_00

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().