Three Criteria for Evaluating Social Programs
Jorge Luis Garcia () and
James Joseph Heckman
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2022, vol. 13, issue 3, 281-286
Abstract:
This article examines the economic foundations of three criteria used for evaluating the costs and benefits of social programs. Some criteria do not consider the scale of programs or address the costs associated with programs that expand or contract the total government budget. A recent addition to the list of evaluation criteria – the marginal value of public funds – does not adopt a social optimality perspective. It evaluates the optimality of expenditures assuming a predetermined aggregate budget without considering the social costs of raising that budget.
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)
Related works:
Working Paper: Three Criteria for Evaluating Social Programs (2022) 
Working Paper: Three Criteria for Evaluating Social Programs (2022) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:13:y:2022:i:3:p:281-286_2
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().