Three Criteria for Evaluating Social Programs

Jorge Luis Garcia () and James Heckman

No 15573, IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER

Abstract: This paper examines the economic foundations of three criteria used for evaluating the costs and benefits of social programs. Some criteria do not consider the scale of programs or address the costs associated with programs that expand or contract the total government budget. A recent addition to the list of evaluation criteria—the marginal value of public funds (MVPF)—does not adopt a social optimality perspective. It evaluates the optimality of expenditures assuming a predetermined aggregate budget without considering the social costs of raising that budget.

Keywords: marginal value of public funds; cost-benefit analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 11 pages
Date: 2022-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ltv and nep-res
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Published - published in: Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2022, 13 (3), 281 - 286

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp15573.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Three Criteria for Evaluating Social Programs (2022)
Working Paper: Three Criteria for Evaluating Social Programs (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp15573

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Fallak ().