Manufacturing and the Convergence Hypothesis: What the Long-Run Data Show

Stephen Broadberry

The Journal of Economic History, 1993, vol. 53, issue 4, 772-795

Abstract: The commonly accepted chronology for comparative productivity levels, based on GDP data, does not apply to the manufacturing sector, which shows evidence of a much greater degree of stationarity of comparative labor productivity performance among the major industrialized countries of Britain, Germany, and the United States. These results for manufacturing suggest that convergence of GDP per worker must have occurred through trends in other sectors and through compositional effects of structural change. The persistent, large labor productivity gap between the United States and Europe cannot be explained simply by differences in capital per worker, but is related to technological choice.

Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (47)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: MANUFACTURING AND THE CONVERGENCE HYPOTHESIS: WHAT THE LONG RUN DATA SHOW (1992)
Working Paper: Manufacturing and the Convergence Hypothesis: What the Long Run Data Show (1992)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jechis:v:53:y:1993:i:04:p:772-795_05

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Economic History from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().